Low-code: magic wand or instrument with limitations?

Myth: Low-code is a universal “magic wand” that will replace the traditional design and is suitable for any task.

In fact: Low-code is a tool with certain limitations. Its effectiveness depends on the application. For some tasks (complex, highly loaded, requiring unique logic or deep security) traditional development remains a more reliable solution.

Myth: With Low-code you can create any, even the most complex and unique application.

In fact: Low-code is ideal for:

1. Simple applications (forms, simple CRM, accounting)
2. Fast prototypes and MVP.
3. Internal corporate instruments.
4. Automation of routine tasks.

Low-code is not suitable for:

1. Complex applications with a high degree of personalization.
2. Systems requiring integration with many external systems.
3. Applications with high performance requirements.
4. Systems with unique technology or library requirements not supported by the platform.

Myth: Low-code gives complete freedom and control over the application being developed.

In fact:

1. Limited flexibility: Customization capabilities are limited by the platform’s functionality. You cannot freely use any technologies and libraries.
2. Lack of code control: Lack of access to source code may limit the ability of the application to fine-tune, optimize and deep debug.

Myth: Low-code automatically provides sufficient security for all types of data.

In fact: For applications that work with sensitive data, low-code platforms may not meet the high security requirements, which often require fine-tuning and deep control at the code level.

Low-code is a tool, not the goal itself, and its effectiveness depends on how well it is applied. In some cases, traditional development remains a more effective and reliable solution.