In the past tech debt used to be perceived only as a technical term that concerned only internal engineers since its problems were invisible. These days, however, tech debt is not only problems hidden in backlogs, but also a huge business risk that affects delivery timelines, product scalability, operating costs, and ultimately revenue. For companies building digital products in a fast-changing market, ignoring tech debt means accepting structural instability in the core of the business.
Tech debt is the technical shortcuts taken by development teams to meet business goals, often driven by tight deadlines, limited budgets, or pressure to release faster. It refers to the accumulated cost of short-term technical decisions made to speed up delivery, such as quick fixes, outdated architectures, insufficient testing, poor documentation, or postponed refactoring.
Even though it might be beneficial for a short time and speed up the process, the outcomes of tech debt are way more significant. Over time, the system will be harder to modify, more expensive to maintain, and increasingly fragile as well as rework will be more complex and slower.
TOP 3 risks that may affect businesses
Although tech debts might have advantages and might be useful sometimes, mostly it has significant risks for businesses.
1. Time-to-Market Degradation
If initially tech debts are taken to speed up the process, sometimes it can also slow development since more time is spent on bugs and complex workarounds. The more shortcuts are used, the more code becomes tangled up, meaning the work gets more complex.
2. Escalating Development Сosts
If code is outdated, poorly structured, or lacks tests, even small changes require extra effort to avoid breaking existing functionality. Developers spend more time fixing side effects, rewriting parts of the system, and resolving recurring bugs rather than building new features. As a result, delivery slows down while labor costs rise and maintaining the program gets more expensive.
3. Reduced Product Reliability
Systems with high tech debt are inherently unstable. They fail more often, degrade under load, and resist scaling. Adding users, features, or integrations exposes architectural weaknesses, leading to outages and performance issues.
Is tech debt a disadvantage?
On the other hand, tech debt is not a sign of poor engineering, but a strategic trade-off that must be consciously managed since the problem arises when it is invisible, unmeasured, or ignored. Treating tech debt seriously means making it part of business decision-making: prioritizing it alongside features, allocating budget for reduction, and evaluating its impact on future growth.
At Mifort, we approach tech debt as a business variable, not a purely technical one. Our teams assess architectural risks early, design scalable foundations, and help clients balance speed with sustainability. When inheriting existing systems, we audit technical debt, identify critical risk zones, and propose pragmatic remediation plans aligned with business goals.
Conclusion
Although tech debts have some risks for businesses, it is still beneficial and can be used if it is managed carefully. Considering all the risks, solving the problems on time, and managing it professionally reduces the risks.
Headquarter: